Prediction of Paul Mcnamee vs Mike De Palmer Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Mcnamee vs M. De Palmer

Paul Mcnamee

AUS

3

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mike De Palmer

USA

3

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Mcnamee 3 - 3 Palmer

They have played 13 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 6 and Mike De Palmer winning 7. The last match between Mike De Palmer and Paul Mcnamee was at the Wembley, 10-11-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Mike De Palmer getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mcnamee	3
Palmer	3

Last 6 H2H Matches:

(R3) Wembley(11-10-86)

Stats

Mike De Palmer

Paul Mcnamee

(R4) Queens Club(06-10-85)

Stats

Paul Mcnamee

Mike De Palmer

(R4) Sydney Indoor(10-08-84)

Stats

Mike De Palmer

Paul Mcnamee

P. Mcnamee vs M. D. Palmer H2H Profile

P. Mcnamee	Stats	M. D. Palmer
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.74% (260-233)	Career Total W/L	46.55% (81-93)
2	Grass	0
0	Hard	1
1	Indoor	2
4	Titles	0
3	Total H2H Matches	3
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Mcnamee vs M. D. Palmer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mike De Palmer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Mcnamee, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mike De Palmer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Paul Mcnamee has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mike De Palmer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mike De Palmer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Paul Mcnamee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 63/49), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 35/39). Mike De Palmer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 13/15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 15/19).
Player level: In the last year, Paul Mcnamee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mike De Palmer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Paul Mcnamee winning 3 times and Mike De Palmer being victorious 3 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 6 and Mike De Palmer winning 7.
The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Mike De Palmer was at the Wembley, 10-11-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Mike De Palmer getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Mcnamee has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mike De Palmer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mike De Palmer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Mcnamee has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mike De Palmer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Paul Mcnamee vs Mike De Palmer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Mcnamee vs M. D. Palmer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Mcnamee	Stats	M. D. Palmer
3	H2H Matches Won	3
6	Sets Won	7
64	Games Won	71
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (3/6)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (3/6)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (3/3)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/3)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Mcnamee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 11-01-1988
R1 Bill ScanlonB. Scanlon	W	6-3 6-3 6-3	Stats
R2 Sammy Giammalva JrS. Giammalva	W	6-7 7-6 6-2 4-1 RET	Stats
R3 Pat CashP. Cash	L	6-1 6-2 6-1	Stats
Adelaide - 28-12-1987
R3 Charles Bud CoxC. Bud	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
R4 Wally MasurW. Masur	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

M. D. Palmer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg CH - 01-05-1989
R4 Peter PalandjianP. Palandjian	L	6-2 7-6	Stats
R3 Stefan Van SchalkwykS. Van	W	2-6 6-2 6-2	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 12-09-1988
R4 Scott DavisS. Davis	L	5-7 6-4 7-6	Stats
R3 Gary DonnellyG. Donnelly	W	6-3 7-6	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 18-07-1988
R3 David NainkinD. Nainkin	L	0-6 7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

P. Mcnamee vs M. D. Palmer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Mcnamee	Stats	M. D. Palmer
52.74% (260/233)	YTD Win/Loss	46.55% (81/93)
51.88% (662/614)	Sets Win/Loss	47.79% (227/248)
50.55% (6201/6067)	Games Win/Loss	48.69% (2283/2406)
47.30% (35/39)	Hard Win/Loss	45.24% (38/46)
53.16% (126/111)	Clay Win/Loss	46.43% (13/15)
51.43% (36/34)	Indoor Hard W/L	53.57% (15/13)
56.25% (63/49)	Grass Win/Loss	44.12% (15/19)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0.26	Average Opponent Rank	488.78
53.57% (45/39)	Slam W/L	40.00% (12/18)
48.00% (12/13)	Masters W/L	33.33% (4/8)
64.71% (11/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
50.57% (178/174)	Main Tour W/L	50.42% (60/59)
93.33% (14/1)	Challenger W/L	38.46% (5/8)
53% (204/387)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (67/140)
54% (55/102)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	41% (14/34)
52% (74/143)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (33/68)
86% (258/221)	1st Set Won, Won Match	73% (84/61)
14% (258/36)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	27% (84/23)
17% (234/40)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (90/20)